In the current economic climate, we continue to see different types of convertible note arrangements, typically entered into by companies needing to offer attractive returns in order to obtain funds from lenders and investors.
Over the past few months we have been looking at some practical aspects regarding accounting for convertible notes, including:
As noted in these previous articles, in order for a conversion feature to be classified as ‘equity’, the ‘fixed for fixed’ test in IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation must be met, i.e. at initial recognition, the conversion feature gives the holder of the convertible note the right to convert into a fixed number of equity securities of the issuer.
It is common for international companies to raise funds via convertible notes issued in a currency other than their functional currency. Although the issue and repayment amount in foreign currency may be fixed, when converted back to the entity’s functional currency it results in a variable amount of cash (that is, a variable carrying amount for the financial liability that arises from changes in exchange rates), and therefore fails the ‘fixed-for-fixed’ criteria for equity classification.
The conversion feature is therefore a derivative liability, with the value of the conversion feature being dependent on foreign exchange rates.
Global Co has an Australian dollar (AUD) functional currency but is raising funds in the United Stated and issues a USD500,000 convertible note.
The note has a maturity of three years from its date of issue and pays a 10% annual coupon in USD.
On maturity, the holder has an option either to receive a cash payment of USD500,000 or 500,000 of Global Co’s shares.
Assume that the derivative liability has a fair value of AUD10,000 at the time of issue.
Assume also that the exchange rate is USD1.00: AUD1.10.
Analysis
Step one
Starting with the box on the top left hand side of the flowchart above, we consider whether there is a contractual obligation to pay cash that the issuer cannot avoid. The answer is ‘yes’ because Global Co must pay the annual cash coupon, and it could also be required to repay the capital amount at the end of three years if the holder chooses not to exercise the conversion option.
Step two
Step two is to consider whether IAS 32.16A-D apply. When an issuer has an obligation to repurchase financial instruments, in certain circumstances, IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Presentation, paragraphs 16A to 16D include exceptions to the usual principles for classifying financial instruments as financial liabilities. In some cases, such instruments could be classified as ‘equity’, despite having an unavoidable obligation to pay out cash. However, this exception does not typically apply to convertible instruments and is not applicable in this example.
Step three
Continuing down the right hand side of the above flow chart, we then consider whether the instrument has any characteristics that are similar to equity. The answer is ‘yes’ because the instrument contains an option to be converted into equity instruments, but the question of whether the conversion feature meets the criteria to be classified as equity is dealt with separately in Step four below.
The host debt component will be classified as a financial liability because Global Co has an unavoidable obligation to pay cash, and on a standalone basis there is no feature in the host debt contract that is similar to equity.
Step four
The conversion feature is then assessed on a standalone basis using the above flowchart. Starting with the box at the top left hand side of the diagram:
The conversion feature also meets the definition of a liability because:
The conversion feature is therefore classified as a derivative liability.
This means that the note as a whole contains the following components:
Initial recognition
For convertible notes with embedded derivative liabilities, the embedded derivative liability is determined first and the residual value is assigned to the debt host liability.
Fair value of convertible note | - | Fair value embedded derivative | = | FV of debt host liability component |
On initial recognition, Global Co receives AUD550,000 (functional currency) at a rate of USD1.00: AUD1.10. Since it has been determined that the FX derivative liability has a fair value of AUD10,000, the carrying amount of the debt host liability on initial recognition by Global Co is therefore AUD540,000. The journal entry recognised by Global Co, in AUD functional currency, on initial recognition is as follows:
Dr | Cr | |
Cash | 550,000 | |
Debt liability | 540,000 | |
Derivative liability | 10,000 |
Subsequent measurement
At the end of subsequent reporting periods during which the convertible note remains outstanding: